|
Post by Host Drew on Nov 11, 2008 3:25:59 GMT -5
Angie, please address the final 2 here , once opening statements have been posted.
|
|
|
Post by Angie Jakusz on Nov 11, 2008 19:48:00 GMT -5
This is what I've been waiting for Congratulation's on making the Final 2. This wouldn't have been my personal favorite Top 2 but it's not me who decides. I don't want any feedback on what I'm about to say because it's not an option. This is what I think and this is what I've come to a conclusion about in the game and outside of the game. Commenting on this will probably cost you my vote. I wanna start by saying Katie, I have no problem with you and you were nothing but nice to me throughout the time we spent together. You didn't lie to me, you were always polite and you you've proved yourself to be a really, really honest person. Ibrehem.. I don't like you, period. I think you come across as egotistical, aggressive and a complete and utter snake. I know I'm not the only one who thinks this and even if I was, I wouldn't hold back in saying so. Even though I cannot stand you, I'm not gonna say I'm not voting for you because I don't place personal opinion's in the game. I'm voting for the person who played the better game and who answers best in the jury questions. Onto the questions. I just was 100% honesty - no garbage or crap at all because everyone will know if you're lying or trying to butter them up. Ibrehem - This game is not only based on strategy but it's based on a social aspect aswell. Why should I give you my vote when I never really spoke with you and you never really made an effort to get to know me? Give me a different reason to "I played the best game" because I think that's going to be an answer to someone elses question. Katie - What qualities do you think you have that I don't to put you in the final 2 and me on the jury? Question for both of you - If you had to choose a Top 5 (out of everyone from the merge - include Jolanda if you wish) then who would it have been and why? Don't just base it on who your friends are because that's lame.
|
|
|
Post by Katie Gallagher on Nov 11, 2008 21:54:13 GMT -5
Hey Angie!
Thats a really loaded question, because I don't know if its positive and negative qualities so much as the position we were both in coming into the merge, and how we handled that. While you tend to be more outspoken and aggressive in challenges and in game play, I initially took a step back and tried to figure out where to go from where I was in being in a minority. Your activeness and popularity are ultimately what made people nervous and wanted you out, I believe. I didn't really have that popularity or connections in this game and while thats maybe not a quality, and not really what you're looking for exactly, its what caused people to underestimate me I think. I really hope that answers your question. Like I said, its hard to pinpoint certain qualities but mostly the fact that people saw me as less of a presence in this game early on the merge.
Another tough question, but if I had to choose a Top 5, it would be myself, Tom, you, Gregg, and Kim. I picked these five not only because I think these were the five that were most into the game, but because you always knew where they stood. It would make for an interesting final 5 to be sure (and I can't say for sure if I would be here if it was actually the case), but like it or not, I think these were the most forthcoming in the game.
Thanks for your questions, they were really tough, and I hope you get what you're looking for!
|
|
|
Post by Ibrehem Rahman on Nov 11, 2008 22:29:16 GMT -5
Ibrehem - This game is not only based on strategy but it's based on a social aspect aswell. Why should I give you my vote when I never really spoke with you and you never really made an effort to get to know me? Give me a different reason to "I played the best game" because I think that's going to be an answer to someone elses question.
Hey Angie. There are a lot of aspects of this game that come into play, and the social game is definitely a major factor. You're right, I didn't get to know you much at all. But that's a two way street. I'll take my share of the blame there, but you never got to know me either. And it's too bad, because your not being close to me is a huge factor in why it was so easy for me to turn against you. Sorry if that's not the sugar coated answer you wanted, but it's an honest answer.
|
|
|
Post by Ibrehem Rahman on Nov 12, 2008 0:09:32 GMT -5
Question for both of you - If you had to choose a Top 5 (out of everyone from the merge - include Jolanda if you wish) then who would it have been and why? Don't just base it on who your friends are because that's lame.
This is an easy question for me. My ideal final five was the final five that we had. Me, Tom, Jeff, Katie, and Gregg. I honestly think those 5 deserved to be where they are, and it's hard to argue against any of us.
|
|